Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (1557MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +197%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P600
1.196 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200 +140%
293
Quadro P600
122
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1329 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1557 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.91 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.37 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.68 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1196 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy