NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (1545MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+167%
9.492 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+341%
9149
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+645%
2185
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
2304
Shading Units
3072
192
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
