Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 420 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +16050%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 420
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
8
192
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy