NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

VS

NVIDIA Quadro K5200

AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages

Lower TDP (150W vs 295W)

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 224% (2495MHz vs 771MHz)

More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)

3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro K5200

3.553 TFLOPS

Radeon PRO W7900 +1625%

61.32 TFLOPS

Blender

Quadro K5200

293

Radeon PRO W7900 +1143%

3642

Quadro K5200

VS

Radeon PRO W7900

Graphics Card

Jul 2014

Release Date

Apr 2023

Quadro

Generation

Radeon Pro Navi

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz

Base Clock

1855 MHz

771 MHz

Boost Clock

2495 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

8GB

Memory Size

48GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

384bit

192.3GB/s

Bandwidth

864.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

96

-

2304

Shading Units

6144

192

TMUs

384

48

ROPs

192

-

RT Cores

96

-

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

-

L2 Cache

6 MB

-

L3 Cache

96 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

479.0 GPixel/s

148.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

958.1 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

122.6 TFLOPS

3.553 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

61.32 TFLOPS

148.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W

TDP

295W

450 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2

Outputs

3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B

GPU Name

Navi 31

-

GPU Variant

Navi 31

Kepler

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

5 nm

7.08 billion

Transistors

57.7 billion

561 mm²

Die Size

529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.2

1.1

Vulkan

1.3

3.5

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

2

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

3

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170

4

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

5

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

6

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

7

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

8

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

9

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

10

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game