Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (1493MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +209%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200 +295%
293
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
2304
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy