Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200 +118%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro K4100M
1.627 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1152
192
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.94 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.78 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.627 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy