NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 108% (1600MHz vs 771MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+1375%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
16384
192
TMUs
1024
48
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
-
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
2400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
100 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
