Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +982%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2880
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF106
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy