Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +7655%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
2880
Shading Units
32
240
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
42W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G84
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy