Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +969%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2880
Shading Units
256
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GF100
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy