Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +1024%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2880
Shading Units
192
240
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT200B
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy