Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1124MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +502%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
30W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM108
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
Unknown
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy