Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (902MHz vs 824MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla K80 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +26%
5.196 TFLOPS
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K6000 +32%
82
Tesla K80
62
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2014
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
824 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
240.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
2496
240
TMUs
208
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.85 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
171.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.113 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1371 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK210
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GK210-885-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
7.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.7
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy