Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +699%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GT216
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy