Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M +33%
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
Quadro K4000M +14%
94
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Quadro K4000M +11%
20
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
960
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy