Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1124MHz vs 784MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 108W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200 +144%
2.107 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
Quadro K4200 +117%
178
OctaneBench
Quadro K620M
18
Quadro K4200 +77%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1344
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GK104
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy