Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1700MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
6272 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +2522%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
64GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
6656
16
TMUs
416
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy