Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +1553%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT216
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy