Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1519MHz vs 1163MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +14%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Pascal-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1493 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1519 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.30 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.61 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.30 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.555 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.61 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
40W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N18P-Q1-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy