Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1395MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4 +815%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
640
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy