Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA L4

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA L4

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 24GB VRAM L4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 72W)
NVIDIA L4 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (2040MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (300.1GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
L4 +2055%
30.29 TFLOPS
VS
L4

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
795 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
300.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
60
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
7424
40
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.2 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.29 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
30.29 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
473.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
AD104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
AD104-???-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
72W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy