Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +510%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
640
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G80
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy