NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+5303%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
55W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G86
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
