Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +7294%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 450
0.019 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.920 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.920 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.20 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G98
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy