Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1036MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +554%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
1024
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy