Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +66%
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2200 Mobile
42
Tesla K20c +30%
55
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2496
64
TMUs
208
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy