Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (1665MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +1702%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
1080 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
10240
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy