Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +204%
1.892 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
188W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy