Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
VS
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC +14%
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
122W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy