NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+773%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF108
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
