NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+4786%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GT218
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
