Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 FHHL to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 FHHL 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1290MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 FHHL +514%
13.21 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1290 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1024
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
412.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.42 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.21 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.605 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy