NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+67%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M5000M
+81%
2810
Quadro M2000
1544
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M5000M
+90%
1312
Quadro M2000
690
Blender
Quadro M5000M
+89%
275
Quadro M2000
145
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
+117%
61
Quadro M2000
28
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM206
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
