Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
2.995 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +31%
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M5000M
275
Tesla K20Xm +35%
372
OctaneBench
Quadro M5000M
61
Tesla K20Xm +3%
63
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
2688
96
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK110
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy