Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +413%
6.844 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
512
256
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GF110
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy