Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1543MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +721%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy