Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1560MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +1086%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1110 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
384
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy