Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +60291%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
May 2020
NVS Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
108
8
Shading Units
6912
4
TMUs
432
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA100
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy