Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 25W)
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (40.10GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro M520 Mobile +3378%
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM108
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy