Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
14072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +208030%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
14080
4
TMUs
880
4
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Aldebaran
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy