Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m +15221%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2496
4
TMUs
208
4
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK110
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy