Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1165MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile +20647%
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2016
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GM204
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy