Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile +12830%
2.974 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2019
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
9
8
Shading Units
1152
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GP106
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy