Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +30130%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
20
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA106
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy