Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
5880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Embedded +62117%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
46
8
Shading Units
5888
4
TMUs
184
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GA104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy