Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro CX +1908%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
8
Shading Units
192
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy