Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2680 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +17008%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2688
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK110
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy