Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M +1778%
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2011
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

1
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GF104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

12W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy