Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +10351%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
8
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy