Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +38348%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2007
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro NVS
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
48
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

21W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy